Even without a discrete GPU, the 14 compute units of the M1 Pro ended up providing about 14% higher graphics performance numbers. Here are the CPU benchmarks from four different recent MacBooks: 2021 M1 Pro MacBook ProĬompute Benchmark 2019 MacBook Air Compute Benchmark Bottom Lineĭuring my tests last year of the M1 MacBook Air, the 2019 MacBook Pro with the Intel Core i9 CPU and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M Compute Engine GPU won out. The scores from any device can be compared directly to scores from other devices to show relative speed. There are two tests: a CPU test and a Compute test. This utility provides a common set of operations that are timed in order to create a score. For just a bit more size and a half-pound more weight, I’m getting more ports, more speed, and more screen real estate: CPU Benchmarksįor benchmark comparison purposes I always use Geekbench 5. By comparison, last year’s MacBook Air weighed 2.8 lbs (1.3kg) and had measurements of 11.97 x 8.36 x 0.63 inches (30.41 x 21.24 x 1.61 cm). Screen size is a bit larger, of course (see photo above). Compared to the 13.3-inch 2560 x 1600 Retina display in the M1 MacBook Air, the screen seems brighter and crisper (more about this later). The screen is a 14.2-inch 3024 x 1964 Apple Liquid Retina XDR Display using ProMotion refresh rates up to 120Hz. The M1 Pro features 10 CPU cores, 8 for performance and 2 for efficiency. Powered by the Apple M1 Pro system-on-chip, the 14-inch MacBook Pro I’m testing today is equipped with 32GB of unified memory and has 1TB of SSD storage. However, the improvements in other areas, such as battery life and graphics performance, may make this a compelling upgrade for users with a first-generation Retina MacBook Pro.Side by side comparison of 2021 14-inch M1 Pro MacBook Pro (left) and 2020 13-inch M1 MacBook Air (right) Specifications Much like the MacBook Air update earlier this year, the MacBook Pro update provides only a modest improvement in processor performance. Running at a lower "base" frequency helps save power. The processors are capable of "boosting" to much higher frequencies when needed. These frequencies are somewhat misleading, as they're the "base" frequencies. What's interesting about these gains is that they come from processors with lower frequencies (e.g., 2.6GHz vs 2.8GHz for the high-end models). Both are 2% to 4% faster than the previous generation. The same gains aren't present in the mid- and low-end models, though. There are some significant performance gains for the high-end model as it's 10% faster than the previous generation. Here are the results for the 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro. Users with applications that only use one core won't notice much difference between the Air and the Pro. What is surprising is that the high-end Pro is only 5% faster than the high-end Air in single-core performance (the difference increases to 13% in multi-core performance). This isn't surprising given that the design focus of the new processors was power consumption, not performance. There are only minor performance gains (2% to 4%) between the new generation and the previous generation. I've also included results for the 13-inch MacBook Air, as people often have trouble deciding between the 13-inch Pro and the 13-inch Air. Here are the results for the 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro. It's a free download and only takes a couple of minutes to run. If you're curious how your Mac or PC compares, you can download Geekbench 3 to find out. Higher Geekbench scores are better, with double the score indicating double the performance. If you're not familiar with Geekbench 3, it is a cross-platform processor and memory benchmark. I've collected Geekbench 3 results for all of the Retina MacBook Pros and charted the results below. I wanted to take a closer look and see how much faster the new Retina MacBook Pros are compared to the previous Retina MacBook Pros. Geekbench 3 results for the new Retina MacBook Pros are now available on the Geekbench Browser and on the Mac Benchmark Chart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |